On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:30 PM, abdoulaye berthe berthe.ab@gmail.com wrote:
Heads up. Requesting ACKs for this patch or I'm atleast warning that it will be applied. We're getting rid of the return value from gpiochip_remove().
this remove all reference to gpio_remove retval in all driver except pinctrl and gpio. the same thing is done for gpio and pinctrl in two different patches.
Signed-off-by: abdoulaye berthe berthe.ab@gmail.com
(...)
I think this patch probably needs to be broken down per-subsystem as it hits all over the map. But let's start requesting ACKs for the individual pieces. Actually I think it will be OK to merge because there is likely not much churn around these code sites.
I'm a bit torn between just wanting a big patch for this hitting drivers/gpio and smaller patches hitting one subsystem at a time. We should be able to hammer this in one switch strike.
It would be better if you could devise a plan to make the switch a subsystem at a time.
[...]
drivers/mfd/asic3.c | 3 ++- drivers/mfd/htc-i2cpld.c | 8 +------- drivers/mfd/sm501.c | 17 +++-------------- drivers/mfd/tc6393xb.c | 13 ++++--------- drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-core.c | 8 ++------
Lee/Sam can either of you ACK this?
I don't see any code?