4 Aug
2010
4 Aug
'10
11:15 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
The symmetric_rates infrastructure was only ever really intended to work over a single DAI so I'd not be at all surprised if it gets a little confused (though I'm surprised it's doing anything at all).
Makes sense. Should I forget the symmetric_rates feature and just handle it internally in my driver?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale