On 11/13/2022 10:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
dma_alloc_coherent is an opaque allocator that only uses the GFP_ flags for allocation context control. Don't pass GFP_USER which doesn't make sense for a kernel DMA allocation or __GFP_COMP which makes no sense for an allocation that can't in any way be converted to a page pointer.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c | 21 +++------------------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c index 436372b314312..24c0f0d257fc9 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c @@ -1761,17 +1761,11 @@ int hfi1_create_rcvhdrq(struct hfi1_devdata *dd, struct hfi1_ctxtdata *rcd) unsigned amt;
if (!rcd->rcvhdrq) {
gfp_t gfp_flags;
amt = rcvhdrq_size(rcd);
if (rcd->ctxt < dd->first_dyn_alloc_ctxt || rcd->is_vnic)
gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL;
else
gfp_flags = GFP_USER; rcd->rcvhdrq = dma_alloc_coherent(&dd->pcidev->dev, amt, &rcd->rcvhdrq_dma,
gfp_flags | __GFP_COMP);
GFP_KERNEL);
A user context receive header queue may be mapped into user space. Is that not the use case for GFP_USER? The above conditional is what decides.
Why do you think GFP_USER should be removed here?
-Dean External recipient