16 Aug
2021
16 Aug
'21
8:34 p.m.
On 14/08/2021 23:19, Aakash Hemadri wrote:
Prefer `of_device_get_match_data` over `of_match_device`
Retrieve OF match data using `of_device_get_match_data`, this is cleaner and better expresses intent.
Signed-off-by: Aakash Hemadri aakashhemadri123@gmail.com
sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c b/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c index b043a0070d20..bf13f3d25cec 100644 --- a/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c +++ b/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct clk *mclk; int ret = 0;
- match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_evm_dt_ids), &pdev->dev);
- match = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
incorrect, of_device_get_match_data() is retrieving the match->data
if (!match) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error: No device match found\n"); return -ENODEV;
--
Péter