The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de --- sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c index cf8fecf97f2c..3035d9856415 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int wm8960_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol); struct wm8960_priv *wm8960 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = wm8960->deemph; + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8960->deemph; return 0; }
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int wm8960_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, { struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol); struct wm8960_priv *wm8960 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec); - int deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; + int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
if (deemph > 1) return -EINVAL;