On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:26 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 26 April 2010 20:13:47 ext Liam Girdwood wrote:
Everything is just carrying on as before except the upstream management effort is being divided between Mark and I. i.e. I'll manage the TI/OMAP based patches, Mark will manage the rest.
I see, it make sense. Are we continuing the practice that in case of OMAP (McBSP) patches Jarkko or/and I have to ack it in order to be accepted? I'm also the maintainer for the twl4030 ASoC codec driver (see MAINTAINERS file)...
Yes, nothing has changed here. :)
Patch submitters should not notice any difference as both trees are based on Takashi's ASoC branch and are regularly kept up to date.
Just to clarify it: You and Mark will send pull request to Takashi,
yes
or is it going to be You -> Mark -> Takashi route?
and yes. Depending on workload, any merge issues, cross tree patches etc.
Liam