+ Vinod
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 10:48 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:07:13 +0200, mengdong.lin@intel.com wrote:
From: Mengdong Lin mengdong.lin@intel.com
This vendor-specific version number is optional. It will be written to the 'version' field of each block header of the binary toplogy data file. The vendor driver can check this number for further processing in kernel.
The topology ABI version number is still stored in the 'abi' field of block headers.
Signed-off-by: Mengdong Lin mengdong.lin@intel.com Reviewed-by: Liam Girdwood liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com
Thanks, applied now. But I have concern about topology ABI/API: have we stabilized it enough? That is, are there any missing patches in the current kernel and alsa-lib/utils git trees that may lead to any API/ABI incompatibilities?
There are a couple of patches that are ABI changes afaik for PCM config/capabilities.
Mengdong, can you point us to your latest code for alsa-lib and kernel with the ABI updates. We can then review the final changes.
Vinod, Subhransu, please shout if there is anything missing from the final ABI updates in Mengdongs alsa-lib/kernel branches.
Thanks
Liam
Takashi
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.