The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de --- sound/soc/ti/ams-delta.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/ams-delta.c b/sound/soc/ti/ams-delta.c index 438e2fa843a0..1028b5efcfff 100644 --- a/sound/soc/ti/ams-delta.c +++ b/sound/soc/ti/ams-delta.c @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int ams_delta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; }
-static int ams_delta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +static void ams_delta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct snd_soc_card *card = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -586,7 +586,6 @@ static int ams_delta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
snd_soc_unregister_card(card); card->dev = NULL; - return 0; }
#define DRV_NAME "ams-delta-audio" @@ -596,7 +595,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ams_delta_driver = { .name = DRV_NAME, }, .probe = ams_delta_probe, - .remove = ams_delta_remove, + .remove_new = ams_delta_remove, };
module_platform_driver(ams_delta_driver);