On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:19:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 01:09:59PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:53:07AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:46:42PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
These look like they should be DAPM controls since they're controlling audio routing but they're being added as regular controls.
Sorry again. You suggest to create a new structure for these entries, for example:
If that's how they fit into the routing for the device, yes - you'd need to define the bypass mixer as well and set up appropraite routes.
I added this reg as regular controls because this reg is pretty generic as you can see this controll bypass of some output, not all. What do you think about?
That sounds exactly like a DAPM control, please make them DAPM controls.
Hi Mark, Perfect, thanks for your suggestion. I'll do it in V2.
Tommaso