-----Original Message----- From: Guo Shawn-R65073 Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 3:14 PM To: Dong Aisheng-B29396 Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@ti.com; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; w.sang@pengutronix.de; u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: mxs: add saif clkmux functions
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 02:42:11PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng b29396@freescale.com Cc: Sascha Hauer s.hauer@pengutronix.de Cc: Wolfram Sang w.sang@pengutronix.de Cc: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Cc: Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Cc: Liam Girdwood lrg@ti.com
changes since v3:
- remove the unneeded locking according to Sascha changes since v2:
- This patch is separated from the following patch based on suggestions from Uwe. [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mx28evk: add platform data for saif
arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c | 56
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/digctl.h | 21 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c index 7954013..6522d5f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/jiffies.h> #include <linux/clkdev.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <asm/clkdev.h> #include <asm/div64.h> @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ #include <mach/mx28.h> #include <mach/common.h> #include <mach/clock.h> +#include <mach/digctl.h>
#include "regs-clkctrl-mx28.h"
@@ -43,6 +45,60 @@ static struct clk emi_clk; static struct clk saif0_clk; static struct clk saif1_clk; static struct clk clk32k_clk; +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clkmux_lock);
+/*
- HW_SAIF_CLKMUX_SEL:
- DIRECT(0x0): SAIF0 clock pins selected for SAIF0 input clocks, and
SAIF1
clock pins selected for SAIF1 input clocks.
- CROSSINPUT(0x1): SAIF1 clock inputs selected for SAIF0 input
clocks, and
SAIF0 clock inputs selected for SAIF1 input clocks.
- EXTMSTR0(0x2): SAIF0 clock pin selected for both SAIF0 and SAIF1
input
clocks.
- EXTMSTR1(0x3): SAIF1 clock pin selected for both SAIF0 and SAIF1
input
clocks.
- */
+int mxs_saif_clkmux_select(unsigned int clkmux) {
- if (clkmux > 0x3)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock(&clkmux_lock);
- __raw_writel(BM_DIGCTL_CTRL_SAIF_CLKMUX,
DIGCTRL_BASE_ADDR + HW_DIGCTL_CTRL + MXS_CLR_ADDR);
- __raw_writel(clkmux << BP_DIGCTL_CTRL_SAIF_CLKMUX,
DIGCTRL_BASE_ADDR + HW_DIGCTL_CTRL + MXS_SET_ADDR);
- spin_unlock(&clkmux_lock);
- return 0;
+}
+int mxs_get_saif_clk_master_id(unsigned int saif_id) {
- unsigned int saif_clkmux;
- unsigned int master_id;
- saif_clkmux = (__raw_readl(DIGCTRL_BASE_ADDR + HW_DIGCTL_CTRL)
&& BM_DIGCTL_CTRL_SAIF_CLKMUX) >>
BP_DIGCTL_CTRL_SAIF_CLKMUX;
- switch (saif_clkmux) {
- case MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_DIRECT:
master_id = saif_id;
break;
- case MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_CROSSINPUT:
master_id = saif_id ? 0 : 1;
break;
- case MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_EXTMSTR0:
master_id = 0;
break;
- case MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_EXTMSTR1:
master_id = 1;
break;
- default:
return -EINVAL;
- }
- return master_id;
+}
I'm not completely comfortable to have these DIGCTL setup in clock code. What about creating a digctl.c for all DIGCTL stuff?
Originally I did as you said. But as suggested by Wolfram a long time ago, the question is that there're already some DIGCTL reference codes in clock-mx28.c, so we thought it may be better to keep this stuff in one place. Also these code looks clock related. Do you think it's suitable?
static int _raw_clk_enable(struct clk *clk) { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/digctl.h b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/digctl.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9bd0496 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/digctl.h @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +/*
- Copyright 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+modify
- it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
+#ifndef __MACH_DIGCTL_H__ +#define __MACH_DIGCTL_H__
+/* MXS DIGCTL SAIF CLKMUX */ +#define MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_DIRECT 0x0 +#define MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_CROSSINPUT 0x1 +#define MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_EXTMSTR0 0x2 +#define MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_EXTMSTR1 0x3
+#define HW_DIGCTL_CTRL 0x0 +#define BP_DIGCTL_CTRL_SAIF_CLKMUX (10) +#define BM_DIGCTL_CTRL_SAIF_CLKMUX (0x3 << 10) +#endif
And if possible, we should try to make these definitions local to that digctl.c.
We can do that if nobody else needs it.
Regards Dong Aisheng