2 May
2014
2 May
'14
6:56 a.m.
On 05/01/2014 10:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:54:14AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
This is exactly the thing (expected clock parenting) we agreed could be put in the device tree I think. ...but I don't know that anyone proposed exactly how that would work.
There's patches been posted by (IIRC) Sylvester Nawrocki for this which I think Mike was basically happy with - I don't immediately see them in -next though, but I may be looking in the wrong place.
Right, there are some patches from Sylwester regarding this. I dont' think the patches are accepted yet as Rob has some reservations against the clock parents.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/9/173
--
Tushar Behera