On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 11:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org wrote:
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
- Compatibles should be specific.
- We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like compatibles.
While re-indenting the first enum, put also axis,artpec8-dw-mshc in alphabetical order.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Kind regards Uffe
I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter for explanation.
.../bindings/mmc/samsung,exynos-dw-mshc.yaml | 25 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,exynos-dw-mshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,exynos-dw-mshc.yaml index 6ee78a38bd74..5fe65795f796 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,exynos-dw-mshc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,exynos-dw-mshc.yaml @@ -14,15 +14,22 @@ maintainers:
properties: compatible:
- enum:
- samsung,exynos4210-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos4412-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos5420-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos5420-dw-mshc-smu- samsung,exynos7-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos7-dw-mshc-smu- axis,artpec8-dw-mshc
oneOf:
- enum:- axis,artpec8-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos4210-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos4412-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos5420-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos5420-dw-mshc-smu- samsung,exynos7-dw-mshc- samsung,exynos7-dw-mshc-smu- items:- enum:- samsung,exynos5433-dw-mshc-smu- samsung,exynos7885-dw-mshc-smu- samsung,exynos850-dw-mshc-smu- const: samsung,exynos7-dw-mshc-smureg: maxItems: 1
-- 2.34.1