On 11/16/2012 01:52 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2012-11-16 03:36, Ricardo Neri wrote:
This relocates and renames the platform devices for ASoC HDMI drivers to give them a more logical structure.
The previous omap-hdmi-audio device is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio-card and is relocated to the SDP4430 and Pandaboard board files. This is to better illustrate the fact that it describes the whole HDMI audio functionality on such boards, including the companion chip.
The previous omap-hdmi-audio-dai is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio. The -dai part is removed to not have references to ASoC concepts in the OMAPDSS HDMI driver. Also, as it will be used by the ASoC HDMI CPU DAI driver, the name refers only to OMAP HDMI audio functionality, irrespective of the board.
The names of the ASoC drivers are also updated accordingly.
And same thing here as with the previous patch. Do the move and rename in separate patches for clarity.
OK. I'll do.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri ricardo.neri@ti.com
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 17 ----------------- drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c | 2 +- sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c | 4 ++-- sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c index 3669c12..97bdff3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c @@ -388,6 +388,11 @@ static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec = { .id = -1, };
+static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card = {
- .name = "omap-hdmi-audio-card",
- .id = -1,
+};
- static struct omap_abe_twl6040_data sdp4430_abe_audio_data = { .card_name = "SDP4430", .has_hs = ABE_TWL6040_LEFT | ABE_TWL6040_RIGHT,
@@ -423,6 +428,7 @@ static struct platform_device *sdp4430_devices[] __initdata = { &sdp4430_dmic_codec, &sdp4430_abe_audio, &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec,
- &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card, };
I don't know anything at all about the audio drivers, but this doesn't feel good to me. The HDMI audio is tied to the HDMI video, both of which are parts of OMAP SoC. So if you have two boards with HDMI video (and thus audio), the device data related to HDMI video and audio are identical except for a few HW details like the GPIOs for the TPD chip.
So is there any reason to add hdmi audio devices in each board file? It sounds to me that a common place to add the device for all boards would make more sense. This could, perhaps, be arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c which handles adding the HDMI device, or some other similar file (although you just removed it from such a file, the devices.c...).
In ASoC, we have three drivers for ASoC HDMI audio. The CPU-DAI driver deals with the CPU audio interface. So, I regard the OMAP HDMI IP as the CPU DAI. A device is needed to probe the driver, but as HDMI audio and video are the same physical component, it made sense to have the HDMI video driver to create it. Furthermore, except for the TPD handling the HDMI driver deals only with OMAP stuff. Also, we will have a single node for HDMI when DT comes. Thus, the device for the ASoC CPU DAI has to be created somewhere.
We also have codec. ASoC codecs are chips like TWL6040 that render/capture audio. For ASoC HDMI, a TV or a home theater unit could be regarded as the codec. Strictly speaking, it is not a device mounted on the board such as TWL6040 but does the same work and we have to represent it for ASoC to use.
Finally we have the ASoC machine (or board) driver, that glues together the DAI and codec.
And actually, why isn't the card driver added in the hdmi video driver, like the omap-hdmi-audio-dai?
The card driver represents a board. It made sense to me to relocate it into the board files. Furthermore, when HDMI DT is supported in the feature, the node for this machine driver will be in the DT; so, we will not needed and we would end up relocating it anyways.
You say the omap-hdmi-audio-card covers also the TPD chip, but why does HDMI audio even need to cover that chip? It has no relevance to the audio side, as long as the video driver enables it properly, right?
Yes, audio does not have anything to do with the TPD chip, but we do need an ASoC machine driver. Thus, the only components that are there to describe an ASoC machine driver are the OMAP, TPD and the HDMI connector. Indeed, to not tie the ASoC machine driver to a specific companion chip (as commented by Liam), I just used the -card suffix.
Perhaps I'm missing something here, as I don't have any knowledge of the audio side, though. What do the different audio devices represent?
I hope the explanation above provides more clarity to you. I think HDMI does not fit seamlessly into the ASoC driver model, as we don't have a real codec and no machine driver seems to be needed. This is the best I could get. :/ :)
So I'm not saying your approach is wrong, I just don't understand it =).
:)
BR,
Ricardo
Tomi