On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:13, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 06/10/2011 08:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:50:17PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 06/10/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
So, I keep on complaining about the way these drivers are just generic to any random Blackfin plus CODEC combination rather than being board specific. It'd be good if we could improve this, even adding something into the driver name to make it clear these are for the EVB would help.
I think this is due, that the codecs them-self sit on an add-on board to the bf5xx eval boards. So you have two boards, the bf5xx eval board with has the codec eval board connected to it. That's why it it is kept so generic. You could connect the codec eval board to any of the bf5xx boards.
I'd be more happy with that if there were some indication in the code that this was for the standard Blackfin EVBs rather than all systems based on Blackfin.
I could rename the machine driver to bf5xx-adau1701-evb for v2.
i'd like to get away from "bf5xx" actually and start using "bfin". ive started doing this in some of the files, so let's not add more.
also, if we do decide to add more to the name, it should be closer to what ADI calls the actual product, so probably "bfin-eval-adau1701". although, once we push the SPORT # and I2C address to platform resources, this should work for more than just the eval. it'd fall into our "basic blackfin" category, so we'd only tweak the Kconfig desc/help text. -mike