The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de --- sound/soc/codecs/wm8955.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8955.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8955.c index 1ab2d462afad..00bec915d652 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8955.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8955.c @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int wm8955_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol); struct wm8955_priv *wm8955 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = wm8955->deemph; + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8955->deemph; return 0; }
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int wm8955_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, { struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol); struct wm8955_priv *wm8955 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec); - int deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; + int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
if (deemph > 1) return -EINVAL;