On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:37:22PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
SND_SOC_SMDK_SPDIF -> ASOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_SPDIF SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8580 -> ASOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8580 SND_SOC_SMDK_WM9713 -> ASOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM9713 SND_SOC_GONI_AQUILA_WM8994 -> ASOC_GONI_AQUILA_WM8994
Hrm. These ones I'm not entirely happy about - we're pretty consistently using SND_SOC_ rather than ASOC_ throughout the subsystem so changing to ASOC_ feels like churn. Is there any great reason for the rename? I don't mind the addition of SAMSUNG_ one way or the other, it's just the subsystem prefix.
If SND_SOC is to be used across all platforms, my changes are indeed out of line. Otherwise, ASOC represents SND_SOC better and compactly.
I've applied this just now as the rename patch depends on it.
Ok, though I was/am willing to submit yet another revision.
Thanks.