![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a7c9a4773543c649adc71c95805d2cbf.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
2 Jul
2013
2 Jul
'13
5:34 p.m.
On 07/02/2013 11:04 AM, Bo Shen wrote: [...]
-/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*\
- DMAENGINE operations
-*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ -static bool filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *slave) -{
- struct at_dma_slave *sl = slave;
- if (sl->dma_dev == chan->device->dev) {
chan->private = sl;
return true;
- } else {
return false;
- }
-}
I'm wondering why is filtering no longer required?
[...]
slave_config->dst_addr = (dma_addr_t)ssc->phybase + SSC_THR;
[...]
slave_config->src_addr = (dma_addr_t)ssc->phybase + SSC_RHR;
Change the type of phybase to dma_addr_t
[...]
}
-static int atmel_pcm_dma_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) -{
- struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data;
- struct atmel_pcm_dma_params *prtd;
- prtd = snd_soc_dai_get_dma_data(rtd->cpu_dai, substream);
- ssc_writex(prtd->ssc->regs, SSC_IER, prtd->mask->ssc_error);
- ssc_writex(prtd->ssc->regs, SSC_CR, prtd->mask->ssc_enable);
These writes are also completely lost
- return 0;
-}
I think it would also be good to get rid of any references to the ssc struct from the DMA driver and move them over to the DAI driver.
- Lars