17 Apr
2009
17 Apr
'09
12:22 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
To me, using ssp_dev seems to be cleaner, as all the places where ssp_set_scr is called, we already have an ssp_dev *ssp = priv->dev.ssp set up, which allows us to call ssp_set_scr(ssp, ...) instead of ssp_set_scr(&priv->dev, ...). Same for ssp_get_scr.
Yeah, the combination of ssp_dev and ssp_device is icky in general and largely historical as a result of a partially done transition of the driver to ssp_device.
I'll apply the patch - thanks!