26 May
2014
26 May
'14
4:28 p.m.
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de wrote:
I think the issue with this chip is that it wants a special sequence in which the registers are written when syncing the cache to the hardware. The first thing to check is probably if that is actually necessary. If not just drop the whole restore_regs thing. If it is necessary its probably worth
Good point. After adding the missing entries into the sgtl5000_reg_defaults[] array we can simply remove sgtl5000_restore_regs() and suspend/resume works fine.
Thanks for the suggestion.