28 May
2013
28 May
'13
9:57 p.m.
Dear Mark Brown,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:34:56AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
- case SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD:
- case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD: snd_soc_update_bits(w->codec, SGTL5000_CHIP_ANA_POWER,
SGTL5000_VAG_POWERUP, 0);
msleep(400);
mdelay(400);break;
This looks to be both unrelated and a regression - mdelay() should be more resource intensive than sleeping and if it's 400ms we shouldn't be that worried about delaying slightly longer.
Definitelly, this was not supposed to be part of the patch. Fixed in V2.
Please note my updated mail address which I've been using for a while now, the Wolfson one will go bad at the end of the week.
Roger. I hope you have a good time at your new position :)
Best regards, Marek Vasut