On 10/05/2023 09:33, Martin Povišer wrote:
On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:30, Martin Povišer povik+lin@cutebit.org wrote:
On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org wrote:
On 09/05/2023 17:34, Martin Povišer wrote:
A bunch of TI's codecs have binding schemas which force #sound-dai-cells to one despite those codecs only having a single DAI. Allow for bindings with zero DAI cells and deprecate the former non-zero value.
Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer povik+lin@cutebit.org
'#sound-dai-cells':
- const: 1
- # The codec has a single DAI, the #sound-dai-cells=<1>; case is left in for backward
- # compatibility but is deprecated.
- enum: [0, 1]
Does it? I see playback and capture.
I think so. Playback and capture are not separate DAIs.
Martin
I double checked, I am pretty sure. There’s a single snd_soc_dai_driver, which becomes a single DAI.
Indeed, I see now one entry... Ehh... -ENOTENOUGHCOFFEE
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Best regards, Krzysztof