On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:20:46 +0530 Vinod Koul vinod.koul@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:46:13PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:06:27PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
[...]
Which makes me thinking how does those strings describe the SSP port setup? E.g. do they reflect what port is actually used or could it be possible that those are just driver strings but firmware could have been tuned for SSP0? If I looked at earlier right, Teclast has the low pin-count Baytrail without SSP2 but I'm not sure about that.
The FW doesnt provide way to changes ports from driver in this, so this doesnt mean much. If we are sure it is not ssp2, I can provide ssp1 fw for test
I ahve pushed latest BYT version we have as well as added binary for second SSP port. Please give it a try:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/firmware.git/commit/?h=by...
Thanks Vinod, but I see these are in the ELF format, and the mainline driver does not support this format, at least the last time I checked it didn't.
My bad, updated the patch now with right format
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/firmware.git/commit/?h=by...