On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:55:46PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:52:57 +0100 Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
I'm OK with the ASoC changes. It looks like there are some dependencies on the OMAP changes in there so they should probably go via the OMAP tree?
Is Peter available or having a vacation? He would have better possibilities to say and test the PM changes. Now omap_pcm_pointer is very accurate and I would like that it remains accurate unless user especially wants low-power over it.
No idea; I've not seen him recently but there's not been much TWL4030 or OMAP activity so that's not surprising. It'd be nice (but not essential) to be able to automatically dial back the accuracy when given enormous buffers to play since that's normally a good indication that the data is non-critical.
My wife and kids are having vacation so my ability to review, test and understand those more fundamental changes is somewhat reduced.
I've no OMAP hardware I can readily do anything with so you're probably still ahead of me for the OMAP-specifics.