23 Jun
2008
23 Jun
'08
4:55 p.m.
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Well, let me clarify a bit more: if the patch should be *merged* to 2.6.26 tree, this has to be noted somewhere. The text "the patch is for 2.6.26" can be understood (as I did so indeed) like that "the patch can be applied cleanly to 2.6.26".
Hmmm. When I said, "this patch is for 2.6.26", I meant that the patch is for 2.6.26. I guess I'll be more explicit next time.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale