27 Jun
2012
27 Jun
'12
11:39 a.m.
At Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:11:21 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:25:43PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Could you put it in the next pull request? It's not fixed in the upstream yet.
It's fixed in -next, not in for-3.5. I guess I'll pick the change over at some point.
Hm, OK.
Ideally, such a problem should have been fixed for 3.5 by just removing const, and add const again once after ASoC core is changed for 3.6. But I've been ignoring this warning since it's certainly no big issue.
Takashi