20 Jan
2016
20 Jan
'16
11:45 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:43:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
The newly added rt5659 codec driver unconditionally defines an ACPI device match table but then uses ACPI_PTR() to remove the only reference to it, so we get a harmless build warning:
sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c:4200:30: warning: 'rt5659_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] static struct acpi_device_id rt5659_acpi_match[] = {
This removes the ACPI_PTR() to avoid the warning.
Why is this a better fix than conditionally defining the table?