28 May
2013
28 May
'13
4:59 p.m.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:34:56AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
- case SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD:
- case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD: snd_soc_update_bits(w->codec, SGTL5000_CHIP_ANA_POWER, SGTL5000_VAG_POWERUP, 0);
msleep(400);
break;mdelay(400);
This looks to be both unrelated and a regression - mdelay() should be more resource intensive than sleeping and if it's 400ms we shouldn't be that worried about delaying slightly longer.
Please note my updated mail address which I've been using for a while now, the Wolfson one will go bad at the end of the week.