4 Jul
2013
4 Jul
'13
12:23 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:11:24AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 09:49:59AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
but what was the change from the last time?
Apologies no change from last time for patch one, just adding in your feedback for patch two probably should have added in a comment to that effect.
Thought it would be best to resend both patches though to save people digging them out of two seperate threads.
Since I'd already reviewed it you should've included the Reviewed-by I'd provided in the resend - this saves people having to re-read the same code they've previously reviewed, ensures people who provide review and testing get credit and also saves maintainers the effort of collecting all the acks and so on manually.