5 Jan
2009
5 Jan
'09
10:09 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Are all these 2.6.30 material or for 2.6.29?
They're a bit on the edge, I'd expect them to be safe for 2.6.29 but the conservative thing would be to punt to 2.6.30. None of them are critical.
For 2.6.30, I'll create another branch. It won't be included in linux-next, too, until rc1 is reached (Stephen requested so), but we can keep it in our main branch, of course.
How about branching off a fixes branch for 2.6.29 rather than a -next branch? That way we can keep using the same branch for further fixes through the -rc series. Doesn't make much difference either way, though.