11 Aug
2014
11 Aug
'14
8:19 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:00:22PM -0400, jonsmirl@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
That's absolutely fine, the clocking arrangements and sequencing requirements for achieving it are in general going to depend on the machine. The machine may have requirements which mean that it doesn't want to use a clock configuration it's physically possible for it to generate, or it may want to do more extensive reparenting depending on use case.
We probably need something like EPROBE_DEFER that is used in the driver subsystem to allow that various pieces to so this out.
That really doesn't solve the problem - consider reparenting for example.