24 Oct
2018
24 Oct
'18
9:06 a.m.
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:19:28 +0200, Timo Wischer wrote:
On 10/18/18 20:57, Takashi Iwai wrote:
But how can it be at the first place? (352 353) is already empty as the frames. The time could be kept in this representation, but the frames must be integer.
Which order of calls did it result in so?
We know that some order of calls make the selection impossible like the above, especially when both time and bytes/frames are mixed.
I have used the following ALSA configuration:
pcm.test_rate { type rate slave.pcm hw:gmdcard slave.rate 48000 }
And which driver is gmdcard?
Takashi