The patch
ASoC: SOF: Intel: byt: fix operator precedence warnings
has been applied to the asoc tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.5
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
From f9f618e7128e834db3f54d290a926c4a71104e02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:43:09 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: byt: fix operator precedence warnings
Address cppcheck warnings
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:163:26: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] panic & SHIM_IPCX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:164:26: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] panic & SHIM_IPCX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", panic); ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:167:25: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] imrx & SHIM_IMRX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:168:25: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] imrx & SHIM_IMRX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrx); ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:171:27: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] status & SHIM_IPCD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:172:27: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] status & SHIM_IPCD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", status); ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:175:25: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] imrd & SHIM_IMRD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c:176:25: style: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation] imrd & SHIM_IMRD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrd); ^
Fixes: 3a9e204d4e369 ("ASoC: SOF: Intel: Add context data to any IPC timeout.") Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191011164312.7988-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.i... Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c index b2597ecfdc1c..07e5efe4945c 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c +++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c @@ -160,20 +160,20 @@ static void byt_dump(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 flags) imrd = snd_sof_dsp_read(sdev, BYT_DSP_BAR, SHIM_IMRD); dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: ipc host -> DSP: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", - panic & SHIM_IPCX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", - panic & SHIM_IPCX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", panic); + (panic & SHIM_IPCX_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no", + (panic & SHIM_IPCX_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", panic); dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: mask host: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", - imrx & SHIM_IMRX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", - imrx & SHIM_IMRX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrx); + (imrx & SHIM_IMRX_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no", + (imrx & SHIM_IMRX_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", imrx); dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: ipc DSP -> host: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", - status & SHIM_IPCD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", - status & SHIM_IPCD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", status); + (status & SHIM_IPCD_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no", + (status & SHIM_IPCD_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", status); dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: mask DSP: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", - imrd & SHIM_IMRD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", - imrd & SHIM_IMRD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrd); + (imrd & SHIM_IMRD_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no", + (imrd & SHIM_IMRD_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", imrd);
}