On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:33:11 +0100, manohar.narkhede@imgtec.com wrote:
From: Manohar Narkhede Manohar.Narkhede@imgtec.com
Signed-off-by: Manohar Narkhede Manohar.Narkhede@imgtec.com
Could you give a bit more information? The configuration you gave isn't very straightforward, something really special.
diff --git a/src/conf/cards/Makefile.am b/src/conf/cards/Makefile.am index 008d399..60b5309 100644 --- a/src/conf/cards/Makefile.am +++ b/src/conf/cards/Makefile.am @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ cfg_files = aliases.conf \ Maestro3.conf \ NFORCE.conf \ PC-Speaker.conf \
- pistachio-card.conf \ PMac.conf \ PMacToonie.conf \ PS3.conf \
diff --git a/src/conf/cards/aliases.conf b/src/conf/cards/aliases.conf index 4a92fb2..60f9d26 100644 --- a/src/conf/cards/aliases.conf +++ b/src/conf/cards/aliases.conf @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ AV100 cards.CMI8788 AV200 cards.CMI8788 CMI8786 cards.CMI8788 CMI8787 cards.CMI8788 +pistachio cards.pistachio-card
confdir:pcm/default.conf confdir:pcm/dmix.conf diff --git a/src/conf/cards/pistachio-card.conf b/src/conf/cards/pistachio-card.conf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9c0318d --- /dev/null +++ b/src/conf/cards/pistachio-card.conf @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +# +# Configuration for the pistachio chip +#
+pistachio-card.pcm.default{
@args [ CARD ]
@args.CARD {
type string
default "pistachio"
}
@args.DEVICE {
type integer
default 2
}
type asym
capture.pcm {
type multi
slaves.a.pcm "hw:0,4"
slaves.a.channels 12
bindings.0.slave a
bindings.0.channel 4
bindings.1.slave a
bindings.1.channel 5
}
So for the capture, we always ignore $DEVICE but use the fixed one, right?
And, for the configuration, the multi plugin is superfluous. It has only one slave, so it can be a simple route plugin. But...
playback.pcm {
type hw
card $CARD
device $DEVICE
}
... this is the hw plugin. And it means that the "default" PCM won't work with any other configuration. We usually wrap it with plug plugin.
Also, most of other configuration allow the multiplexing via dmix and dsnoop. I don't know whether these would work for your systems, but by defining the like above, the access will be exclusive. If this is per design, it must be explained in the comments or in the commit log (at best in both).
thanks,
Takashi