24 Sep
2014
24 Sep
'14
10:21 a.m.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:11:27AM +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Le 23 sept. 2014 03:51, "Mark Brown" broonie@kernel.org a écrit :
Depending on what the system looks like it's not at all clear that there should be any visibility at all of DPCM in the DT - it's a detail of how Linux is implemented at the end of the day.
So this should definitely be implemented directly in a specific driver for my FPGA which is a DPCM right ?
No, that's really not what DPCM is all about... if this is a physically separate device that's not got direct memory access it's probably more appropriate to represent as a CODEC. I was CCed in part way so don't entirely know.