* Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org [200214 12:50]:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 12/02/2020 16.35, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Oops, that's not good. So should we just keep the old naming if there's only one endpoint?
That's an option, yes, if we really need extra dummy McBSP DAIs at all, again, let's hear from Morimoto-san or Mark.
We really shouldn't need dummy DAIs at all I think, if we do it feels like there's a problem. It's quite possible that there is actually a problem here though...
It's dummy in the droid4 voice call case as mcbsp is not the clock-master and there's nothing to configure for mcbsp.
But I guess in some cases mcbsp could be the clock-master and then the secondary DAI would have ops.
I could be wrong though, this is just based on my experience with getting one device working.
Regards,
Tony