6 Jun
2011
6 Jun
'11
12:51 p.m.
On 06/06/11 10:31, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 06/06/11 01:47, Greg Dietsche wrote:
the code always returns ret regardless, so if(ret) check is unecessary.
Good point, though please spell check your commit messages. unecessary -> unnecessary
Also if you want to do this sort of cleanup, please also fix the equivalent in wm8940_resume and wm8940_add_widgets. Ack is for what is here, plus those if you do them.
Just as an aside, there is no earthly point in cc'ing lkml for a simple cleanup like this. Just adds to already huge amount of noise!
Signed-off-by: Greg Dietsche Gregory.Dietsche@cuw.edu
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron jic23@cam.ac.uk
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood lrg@ti.com