12 Aug
2014
12 Aug
'14
2:48 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:43:49PM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c @@ -4099,6 +4099,15 @@ static int wm8994_codec_probe(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) dev_warn(codec->dev, "Failed to request Mic1 detect IRQ: %d\n", ret);
} else {
ret = wm8994_request_irq(wm8994->wm8994,
WM8994_IRQ_MIC1_DET,
wm8994_mic_irq, "Mic 1 detect",
wm8994);
if (ret != 0)
dev_warn(codec->dev,
"Failed to request Mic1 detect IRQ: %d\n",
ret);
This need a better changelog and possibly some editing of the code to make it clearer. According to the above diff we're in the else case for an if statement where the true path also requests the same interrupt (or at least something with the same text reported in the error message).