On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:54:09PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:46:41 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:35:06PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:02:42 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Here are the remaining patches to make the build succeed on NetBSD. More patches are needed for FreeBSD and Solaris, but let's take it one at a time :-)
I think the first two (0002 and 0003) should be uncontroversial.
For patch 0004 it would perhaps be good to have versionsort/alphasort in a central place instead of two. Do you have a suggestion where?
I'm not sure what to do about 0005 since you said you don't want to modify include/sound/asound.h.
Right. If we need to modify, it must be applied to Linux kernel tree at first, then copy back to alsa-lib.
I haven't done this before.
I see on https://www.kernel.org/doc/linux/MAINTAINERS
SOUND M: Jaroslav Kysela perex@perex.cz M: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.com L: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org (moderated for non-subscribers) W: http://www.alsa-project.org/ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git T: git git://git.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel.git Q: http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/list/ S: Maintained F: Documentation/sound/ F: include/sound/ F: include/uapi/sound/ F: sound/
Against which of the two git trees should I prepare the patch?
Use my sound git tree.
Ok, I've just sent a patch against that repository to this mailing list. Thomas