16 May
2016
16 May
'16
3:12 p.m.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 02:58:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Even if I'd like to not have these in bus operations, the struct snd_ac97 had a need for a 'caps', 'ext_id', ... fields for example. Yet these could be contained in the ac97_codec_device structure and not exposed to bus operations.
Do we have any example of such exceptions? For AC97, we don't need to think of future extensions at all.
I can't think of any, even for some of the more fancy CODECs used in embedded systems.