
9 Jan
2023
9 Jan
'23
2:40 p.m.
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 12:45:51 +0100, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote:
From: Xu Panda xu.panda@zte.com.cn
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer. That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings.
Signed-off-by: Xu Panda xu.panda@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Yang Yang yang.yang29@zte.com.cn
sound/core/control_led.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/control_led.c b/sound/core/control_led.c index f975cc85772b..c88653c205eb 100644 --- a/sound/core/control_led.c +++ b/sound/core/control_led.c @@ -534,8 +534,7 @@ static ssize_t set_led_id(struct snd_ctl_led_card *led_card, const char *buf, si struct snd_ctl_elem_id id; int err;
- strncpy(buf2, buf, len);
- buf2[len] = '\0';
- strncpy(buf2, buf, len + 1);
Still using strncpy()...?
thanks,
Takashi