28 Oct
2014
28 Oct
'14
4:04 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:58:24PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 10/27/2014 08:07 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
- if (tx_active) {
if (i2s->tx_fifo_high < 256)
xtfpga_i2s_refill_fifo(i2s);
else
tasklet_hi_schedule(&i2s->refill_fifo);
Maybe use threaded IRQs instead of IRQ + tasklet.
Is that going to play nicely with the fact that the interrupt can be shared and the desire to (AFAICT) do NAPI style stuff with the interrupt disabled for long periods?