25 May
2011
25 May
'11
12:17 p.m.
Hi Liam,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Liam Girdwood lrg@ti.com wrote:
On 24/05/11 19:50, Ben Gardiner wrote:
[...] @@ -603,15 +605,19 @@ static int davinci_pcm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) print_buf_info(prtd->asp_link[0], "asp_link[0]"); print_buf_info(prtd->asp_link[1], "asp_link[1]");
- davinci_pcm_period_elapsed(substream);
- davinci_pcm_period_elapsed(substream);
I assume these are to do with the 2 period phase offset you have so it's probably better to comment this here too.
That's correct and yes I really should have commented this magic a little. I will send an incremental patch that can be folded-in. Thanks again.
Best Regards, Ben Gardiner
--- Nanometrics Inc. http://www.nanometrics.ca