On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:12:57 +0100, Alan Young wrote:
On 17/11/16 15:24, Alan Young wrote:
Similar to recent dshare patch.
Update with sign-off
Sorry for the late follow up, I've been drug by other things for too long.
From 6f93ee59846d2c0058ef702c1fa68d723bfb14f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Young consult.awy@gmail.com Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:15:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] pcm_rate: Do not discard slave reported delay in status result.
snd_pcm_rate_status() gets the underlying status from the slave PCM. This may contain a delay value that includes elements such as codec and other transfer delays. Use this as the base for the returned delay value, adjusted for any frames buffered locally (within the rate plugin).
Also update snd_pcm_rate_delay() similarly.
Signed-off-by: Alan Young consult.awy@gmail.com
src/pcm/pcm_rate.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c b/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c index 6184def..15383ae 100644 --- a/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c +++ b/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c @@ -559,10 +559,9 @@ snd_pcm_rate_read_areas1(snd_pcm_t *pcm, pcm->channels, rate); }
-static inline void snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr(snd_pcm_t *pcm) +static inline void snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr0(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_pcm_uframes_t slave_hw_ptr) { snd_pcm_rate_t *rate = pcm->private_data;
snd_pcm_uframes_t slave_hw_ptr = *rate->gen.slave->hw.ptr;
if (pcm->stream != SND_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) return;
@@ -576,6 +575,12 @@ static inline void snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr(snd_pcm_t *pcm) rate->hw_ptr %= pcm->boundary; }
+static inline void snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr(snd_pcm_t *pcm) +{
- snd_pcm_rate_t *rate = pcm->private_data;
- snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr0(pcm, *rate->gen.slave->hw.ptr);
+}
static int snd_pcm_rate_hwsync(snd_pcm_t *pcm) { snd_pcm_rate_t *rate = pcm->private_data; @@ -586,10 +591,37 @@ static int snd_pcm_rate_hwsync(snd_pcm_t *pcm) return 0; }
+static snd_pcm_uframes_t snd_pcm_rate_playback_internal_delay(snd_pcm_t *pcm) +{
- snd_pcm_rate_t *rate = pcm->private_data;
- if (rate->appl_ptr < rate->last_commit_ptr) {
return rate->appl_ptr - rate->last_commit_ptr + pcm->boundary;- } else {
return rate->appl_ptr - rate->last_commit_ptr;- }
+}
static int snd_pcm_rate_delay(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_pcm_sframes_t *delayp) {
- snd_pcm_rate_t *rate = pcm->private_data;
- snd_pcm_sframes_t slave_delay;
- int err;
- snd_pcm_rate_hwsync(pcm);
- *delayp = snd_pcm_mmap_hw_avail(pcm);
- err = snd_pcm_delay(rate->gen.slave, &slave_delay);
- if (err < 0) {
return err;- }
- if (pcm->stream == SND_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
*delayp = rate->ops.input_frames(rate->obj, slave_delay)+ snd_pcm_rate_playback_internal_delay(pcm);- } else {
*delayp = rate->ops.output_frames(rate->obj, slave_delay)+ snd_pcm_mmap_capture_hw_avail(pcm);- }
Hmm, I'm not 100% sure through a quick review whether it's the correct calculation. Maybe it's worth to give more comments either in the code or in the changelog.
return 0; }
@@ -1083,15 +1115,17 @@ static int snd_pcm_rate_status(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_pcm_status_t * status) status->state = SND_PCM_STATE_RUNNING; status->trigger_tstamp = rate->trigger_tstamp; }
- snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr(pcm);
- snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr0(rate, status->hw_ptr);
This can't work.
I can fix it in my side, but OTOH, this made me wonder how you tested the patch...
status->appl_ptr = *pcm->appl.ptr; status->hw_ptr = *pcm->hw.ptr; if (pcm->stream == SND_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
status->delay = snd_pcm_mmap_playback_hw_avail(pcm);
status->delay = rate->ops.input_frames(rate->obj, status->delay)+ snd_pcm_rate_playback_internal_delay(pcm);
status->delay = snd_pcm_mmap_capture_hw_avail(pcm);
status->delay = rate->ops.output_frames(rate->obj, status->delay)+ snd_pcm_mmap_capture_hw_avail(pcm);
Why only playback needs the special handling while the capture doesn't? Again, some comments would be helpful for better understanding your changes.
thanks,
Takashi