7 Aug
2015
7 Aug
'15
6:38 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 09:30:29AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 02:30:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Indeed, a major goal of disabling PM support is to save space.
Then maybe we should adjust dev_pm_ops definition to omit members that are not used if given state is not supported? We have a lot of drivers that are not doing silly pointer #define games.
Yeah, I've always been vaugely surprised that we don't do that.