On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:13:52PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to be used there?
By 'normal work' do you mean the close_delayed_work() used for standard PCM DAIs?
Yes - making up this empty work doesn't seem like a robust approach.
Yeah, I think the problem is more one of bad naming. I should define that function as the delayed work for codec-2-codec links, it just happens that we don't currently have to do anything for them. The only thing the pcm close_delayed_work() does is to send a SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_STOP but for c2c links we never send a start anyway.