26 Jul
2023
26 Jul
'23
6:16 a.m.
size_t here or at least unsigned int is more correct.
for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, NULL, -1) dev_num++;
return dev_num; }
Otherwise, yes, that's what I have in mind.
Will test it in next few days.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Thanks for the review. I've modified the v2 patch accordingly.
Regards, Brent