10 Jul
2007
10 Jul
'07
11:31 a.m.
At Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:04:17 -0700, Tobin Davis wrote:
Then I humbly sign off on that patch.
For the record:
Summary: HDA - patch to fix issue with Lenovo Thinkpad codec ID.
This patch fixes an issue in Lenovo Thinkpads where the codec ID gets changed.
Signed off by Tobin Davis tdavis@dsl-only.net
Well, I don't think this is a generic problem, so let's keep it out of the upstream for now. Maybe I'll rethink if the same problem occurs to anyone else, too...
Takashi
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 18:58 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote:
It worked!!! Thanks a lot I thought my hardware was broken! 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis@dsl-only.net>: Patch needs to be applied as follows: cd alsa-driver-1.0.14/alsa-kernel patch -p1 < LenovoX60S.patch cd .. Then you can rerun configure && make && make install. Tobin On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote: 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis@dsl-only.net>: > Sorry for missing this thread. I just woke up. > > I looked at your first pastebin output, and the actual audio codec shows > up as 0x51d41981, when it should be 0x11d41981. This is why the Analog > driver patch isn't detecting it. > > Can you try this patch against alsa-driver-1.0.14? It should detect > this codec. Still not sure why it is misconfigured, unless there is a > bios issue. > I'm afraid, probably when i tried the Linuxant codecs for the modem it broke the bios. Not sure, but sound worked, and continued working some reboots later. But when i tried a few things with wine and rebooted, sound never worked again When i aply the patch (probably i don't do it good) there are problems: xavier@corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14$ cat LenovoX60S.patch | patch -p1 patching file pci/hda/patch_analog.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 3402. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file pci/hda/patch_analog.c.rej xavier@corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14/pci/hda$ cat patch_analog.c.rej *************** struct hda_codec_preset snd_hda_preset_a *** 3402,3407 **** { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 }, { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 }, { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 }, { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 }, { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a }, --- 3402,3408 ---- { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 }, { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 }, { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, + { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 }, { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 }, { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a }, The patch is ok? Thanks (Tobin sorry for sending messge two times) -- Tobin Davis <tdavis@dsl-only.net>
-- Tobin Davis tdavis@dsl-only.net