15 Sep
2022
15 Sep
'22
8:47 p.m.
Following up on: On 9/13/2022 6:58 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
Why aren't you changing the "ei_array" field in the qmi_elem_info structure to be const? Or the "ei" field of the qmi_msg_handler structure? And the qmi_response_type_v01_ei array (and so on)?
All of these suggestions were actually part of the prerequisite patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=ff6d365898d4d31bd557954c7fc53f38977b491c
So I think all of the comments have been addressed.
Thanks! /jeff