Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC 2/2] spi: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated SPI slaves

On Friday, October 25, 2013 01:59:09 PM Mark Brown wrote:

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:19:00PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:

...

Current spi bus_num.chip_select "spix.y" based device naming scheme may not be stable enough to be used in name based matching, for instance within ALSA SoC subsystem.

I'm happy with this from the SPI side modulo Raphael's comments - are folks happy from the ACPI side?

I think yes in general, but I'd like to understand why the ACPI_HANDLE() thing doesn't work as expected.