22 Jan
2009
22 Jan
'09
2:27 p.m.
At Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:23:03 -0500, Matthew Ranostay wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:39:43 -0500, Matthew Ranostay wrote:
@@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ static hda_nid_t stac92hd83xxx_slave_dig_outs[2] = { };
static unsigned int stac92hd83xxx_pwr_mapping[4] = {
- 0x03, 0x0c, 0x20, 0x80,
- 0x03, 0x0c, 0x20, 0x40,
};
What is this change?
From my patch before I made a mistake, somehow I thought port 0xe was 0xf in that change. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Well, if it's needed to be fixed, please create another patch, since this change is basically independent from PWR_REF quirk. Or, at least, include some proper description in changelog.
thanks,
Takashi